Skip to main content

Masterclass: Current Issues in Diplomatic and Consular Law

Join Edinburgh Law School for our Masterclass: Current Issues in Diplomatic and Consular Law. Current Issues in Diplomatic and Consular Law - a two-day online course which looks into some of the most fascinating questions of the law of diplomatic and consular relations.

This course will be held on 7 and 8 July 2026. The course fee is £215.00 and all participants will receive a certificate of completion from Edinburgh Law School at the end of the course.

Early bird discount

We are offering a 10% early bird discount if you register before 1 April 2026. Please use code LAW_10%_2026

UN Flags

Diplomatic and consular law are two of the most fascinating areas of international law. They look back on a long history, but they also continue to raise intriguing questions which puzzle observers and which will be at the centre of our seminars. What, for instance, was a Hungarian cardinal doing for 15 years in the American embassy in Budapest? Why did a Nigerian politician find himself inside a diplomatic bag? How did the International Court of Justice try to stop an execution in Arizona, and why did this involve questions of consular law?

Other questions that arise in this area are of everyday concern to diplomatic agents and consular officers, and everybody who has an interest in this area. What are the immunities that diplomats and consuls enjoy, and why is the inviolability of the premises of the mission important? What does the receiving State have to do to support the work of diplomats and consuls? Does international law allow the planting of listening devices in diplomatic and consular missions?

PHOTO
This course could not have been more comprehensive and thorough. It was a masterpiece of magisterial lucidity leaving the clearest impression in my mind of the work of the consular service and the problems which can arise. I cannot think of any aspect of the subject which was not discussed, and the teachers were immensely approachable, making it easy to ask any questions no matter how small. In a word the course was excellent. Thank you very much for a wonderful course and well done!
Richard Gillis
Retired solicitor and former Clerk to the Council, Derby University
Signing of the Treaty of Ghent

 

The course will be divided into the following seminars: 

Diplomacy in a Time of Tension: Diplomatic Law Today

The first worldwide treaty on diplomatic law - the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations - was adopted only in 1961. But it quickly gained wide acceptance and is considered today the "basic law" of diplomatic relations around the globe. And yet, questions remain. The terms of the Convention are often vague and general, and part of its success arguably lies in the fact that it avoided some tricky problems.

What, for instance, are the precise duties that diplomats owe to the receiving State? At what stage can the host claim that diplomats are "interfering" in its own affairs? How well are diplomats protected against intrusions into the premises of the embassy? And what happens when the mission itself causes danger to the public?

These are some of the questions which we will address in this seminar. The seminar will also introduce some basic concepts of diplomatic law and explain the sources that help us find answers where the Vienna Convention is silent. It also explores situations in which diplomatic law meets with other rules (such as human rights law).

Asylum for Assange: Current Topics in Diplomatic Law

In 2012, Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was granted asylum in the embassy of the Republic of Ecuador in London. It was by no means the first case of diplomatic asylum, nor the last: in April 2024, for instance, the asylum granted to the politician Jorge Glas in the Mexican embassy in Ecuador was brought to an end through a raid of the premises by Ecuadorian security forces. How are cases of asylum on embassy premises to be evaluated under modern international law? Are there regional rules that help to assess the lawfulness of diplomatic asylum?

Interesting questions also arise where members of the diplomatic family are wanted by the police in the receiving State. Do family members have immunity from jurisdiction, or are there particular conditions that apply? Who, under international law, is a member of the "diplomatic family"? What about same-sex partners and partners in polygamous marriages?

The diplomatic bag, too, raises interesting considerations. What happens when the diplomatic bag is used for illicit purposes? Are there any remedies that the receiving State has when it fears that abuses of diplomatic immunities have taken place in that regard?

This seminar deals with these and other questions that are of great significance to diplomatic relations in an ever changing world.

Between Visas and the Death Penalty: The Rights and Duties of Consuls

What is the consular office, and how does it differ from the diplomatic one? This seminar will offer an insight into the everyday work of consuls and will deal with aspects such as the promotion of friendly relations, of trade interests, and of cultural affairs that matter to both sending and receiving State. It will also examine some of the many ways in which consuls help nationals abroad - be it through the issuing of passports and visas or through assistance when citizens of the sending State have found themselves in emergency situations.

A particularly important point concerns communication with nationals of the sending State who were arrested for crimes committed in the host State. Consular help in these cases can be of essential significance and consuls have the right to provide such assistance. Yet the fact that the arrested persons have often not been informed of these rights causes a problem and has led to several cases before the International Court of Justice.

These are among the questions that will be explored in this seminar. The seminar will also convey some basic concepts of consular law and introduce you to the leading international treaty in this field - the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, concluded only three years after its sister convention, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

Murder in the Consulate: Current Topics in Consular Law

In October 2018, Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist and columnist for the Washington Post who had been critical of the Saudi government, entered the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. He was never seen again. According to Turkish sources, he was killed while on the premises of the consulate.

The case raises not only factual questions – its evaluation under the law remains unclear as well. Did Turkey have a right (perhaps even a duty) to enter the consulate as soon as they learnt that Kashoggi's life was in danger? Under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, consular premises are inviolable; but on the question of emergency powers of the receiving State, the Convention is far less clear.

Questions can also arise when the immunity of consular officials is infringed. In December 2013, for instance, Devyani Khobragade, the Indian Deputy Consul-General in New York, was arrested on charges of visa fraud, leading to harsh protests by India. Is the arrest of a consular officer ever possible? Are there conditions that have to be fulfilled, and how are these to be evaluated in the Khobragade case?

These are questions of ongoing significance in consular relations. They and other interesting aspects in which consular law has played a role in contemporary relations will be discussed and critically examined in this seminar.

Dr Paul Behrens

Dr Paul Behrens

Dr Paul Behrens is Reader in Law at Edinburgh Law School and has taught diplomatic and consular law for nearly 20 years at several universities. He is the author of Diplomatic Interference and the Law (Hart Publishing 2016) and co-editor of Diplomatic Law in a New Millennium (Oxford University Press 2017), and he has given talks to diplomatic agents and consular officers.

Consul General Christiane Hullmann

Consul General Christiane Hullmann

Christiane Hullmann is the German Consul General and Dean of the Consular Corps in Scotland. She has served in the German Foreign Service for 22 years, with postings including Head of the Legal and Consular Department at the German Embassy in Kyiv, the Permanent Mission to the United Nations, New York and Head of the Western Balkans Division at the Federal Foreign Office.

Tuesday, 7 July 2026
  • 1:30pm - 3:30pm: Diplomacy in a Time of Tension: Diplomatic Law Today (Dr Paul Behrens)
  • 3:30pm - 4:00pm: Break
  • 4:00pm - 6:00pm: Asylum for Assange: Current Topics in Diplomatic Law (Dr Paul Behrens)
Wednesday, 8 July 2026
  • 1:30pm - 3:30pm: Between Visas and the Death Penalty: The Rights and Duties of Consuls (Consul General Christiane Hullmann)
  • 3:30pm - 4:00pm: Break
  • 4:00pm - 6:00pm: Murder in the Consulate: Current Topics in Consular Law (Consul General Christiane Hullmann)

Please note that this course will not be recorded.

Book your place

 

Image Credits: 

The Allée des Nations in front of the Palace of Nations. Image credit: Tom Page

The Signing of the Treaty of Ghent. Artist: Amédée Forestier

Masterclass: International Criminal Law and the War in Ukraine

Join Edinburgh Law School for our Masterclass 'International Criminal Law and the War in Ukraine' – a two-day online course which looks into some of the most important questions of the law of genocide, war crimes and aggression as it applies to the current conflict in Ukraine.

Unfortunately the July 2026 iteration of this course will not be going ahead.

ICC Building

In 2014, Russia annexed Crimea (part of the territory of its neighbour Ukraine), following this up with support for separatists in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. Eight years later, in 2022, a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine was launched.

These events triggered protests from the international community, with a large majority in the UN General Assembly demanding the unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops. Reports of crimes committed during the invasion soon emerged, with the Independent International Commission of Inquiry in Ukraine finding in October 2022 that war crimes had been carried out since February 2022, and noting that Russian armed forces had been responsible "for the vast majority of the violations identified".

What are the tools that international law can employ to counter abuses of this kind? The International Criminal Court (ICC), set up in 1998 has issued arrest warrants in 2023 and in 2024 against Russian officials, including President Putin. In 2025, agreement was also reached on a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, to be established within the framework of the Council of Europe. But what are the legal challenges that this situation encounters? What crimes exactly can the ICC prosecute, and are there limits to its jurisdiction? What can we learn from past cases in this field?

Person working on their laptop
I thoroughly enjoyed the discussions in the seminars and the very thoughtful and enlightening presentations. Many thanks to everybody who taught on it, and the very best wishes for the future of the course!
A participant in the 2024 Masterclass 'International Criminal Law and the War in Ukraine
Courtroom portrait of Sidney Alderman

 

The course will be divided into the following seminars: 

Justice for Ukraine? Options and Challenges of International Criminal Justice

Ending impunity for international crimes is among the principal aims of international criminal justice. In light of that, it is not surprising that the international community is looking to institutions of international criminal law to deal with those responsible for the conflict in Ukraine, but also for specific crimes committed in the course of the invasion. But such expectations are also nurtured by successful examples in the history of international criminal law, including the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.

In the case of Ukraine, the International Criminal Court did indeed issue arrest warrants against some of the perpetrators. Prominent names are on the Wanted list: Putin himself, but also Maria Lvova-Belova (Presidential Commissioner for Children's Rights in Russia), Sergei Shoigu (former Minister of Defence of Russia) and three leading military officers.

But the question still arises whether international criminal law is a system that can effectively deal with this situation, or if, political obstacles aside, there are legal reasons why the prosecution of the suspected perpetrators may cause difficulties.

These are aspects which will be discussed in this seminar. The seminar will also introduce you to some basic concepts of international criminal law, and explain the legal framework and the precedent of the Nuremberg and Yugoslavia tribunals. It will also broach the question of jurisdiction and explore some of the problems that arise in an attempt to try those wanted under arrest warrants by The Hague.

The View from Bucha: Was Genocide Committed in Ukraine?

When, in April 2022, evidence emerged of the killing of more than 400 civilians in Bucha, charges of genocide soon followed. They have been raised in other contexts as well, such as the shelling of civilians at Irpin in the Kyiv Oblast, and the transfer of Ukrainian children to place them with Russian families.

Genocide, however, is a crime that can be difficult to prove. Cases before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia have shown how narrow the legal interpretation of the crime can be and have highlighted in particular the need to demonstrate a specific intent on the side of the perpetrator - the intent to destroy, in whole or a part, a national, racial, ethnic, or religious group as such.

This seminar investigates the legal understanding of genocide and reflects in this regard in particular on past case law dealing with situations that arose in Bosnia and Herzegovina (including the killing of an estimated 8,000 Bosnian Muslim boys and men at Srebrenica) and in Rwanda (where, over the course of three months, about 800,000 Tutsis were killed by extremist Hutus). It explores the challenges that particular parts of genocidal intent have caused in the international criminal tribunals, highlights points which cause controversy in case law and academic debate alike and shows how these aspects are likely to be applied to the situation of Russian crimes committed in Ukraine.

Attacks on Civilians and Mistreatment of Prisoners of War: War Crimes in Ukraine

War crimes have been reported by several organisations which investigate the situation in Ukraine. The Independent International Commission of Inquiry referred to the "relentless use of explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas" which had "killed and injured scores of civilians and devastated entire neighbourhoods". The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, which had interviewed 159 prisoners of war held by Russia, found that the "vast majority" of the interviewees reported that they had been "tortured and ill-treated" during their internment. When the Chief Prosecutor of the ICC sought arrest warrants against General Kobylash and Admiral Sokolov, he referred, among other things, to "attacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine, including strikes against power plants and sub-stations" that had been carried out from October 2022 to March 2023.

How does the system of the International Criminal Court address questions of war crimes? What are the elements of the relevant crimes that the Prosecutor has to prove, and what type of challenges can arise in this regard?

This seminar explores these questions and will also investigate some fundamental concepts relating to this crime category; in particular the questions 'What makes a war crime a war crime?' and 'What are the differences to other crimes, such as crimes against humanity?'.

The Lure of Nuremberg 2.0: Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression

While numerous States condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the legal understanding of "aggression" comes with its own challenges.

The Nuremberg Tribunal - the court trying the major Nazi war criminals after World War 2 - considered a war of aggression "the supreme international crime" and found that it differed from other war crimes only "in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole". But following Nuremberg, the international community found it difficult to agree on the concept of the crime of aggression - it was only in 2010 that a substantial definition made it into the statute of the International Criminal Court. And even today, legal problems remain - so significant in nature that it is doubtful whether the instigators of the Russian invasion will ever be convicted of this crime before the ICC. It is for that reason that some international observers have mooted the idea of 'Nuremberg 2.0' - the establishment of a separate court that could try Putin and other leading officials for aggression. On 25 June 2025, an agreement was indeed signed between the President of Ukraine and the Secretary General of the Council of Europe to set up a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine.

What are the aspects that make aggression under the Statute of the International Criminal Court a problematic crime? How are initiatives to create a 'second Nuremberg tribunal' to be evaluated? Do they offer a better way forward for the international community?

This seminar will engage with these questions. It will also introduce you to the basic structure of the crime of aggression under the ICC Statute and the safeguards the international community decided to adopt with regard to the prosecution of the crime. It will also reflect on the legal history of 'aggression' after the Nuremberg judgment and the way in which the law on the use of force has shaped this crime category.

Dr Paul Behrens

Dr Paul Behrens

Dr Paul Behrens is Reader in Law at Edinburgh Law School and has taught international criminal law for 20 years at several universities. At Edinburgh, he is organiser of the courses International Criminal Law and Genocide and the Law (a course he established there). He is co-editor of The Criminal Law of Genocide (Ashgate 2012) and Elements of Genocide (Routledge 2017), and editor of Contemporary Challenges to Criminal Justice (Hart 2023). In 2022, he was amicus curiae in the Appeals proceedings in the Ongwen Case before the ICC.

Professor Andreas von Arnauld

Professor Andreas von Arnaulds

Prof Andreas von Arnauld is Co-Director of the Walther Schücking Institute for International Law and co-editor of the German Yearbook of International Law. Before joining the Kiel Law Faculty in 2013, he served as Professor at the University of Münster and the University of the Federal Armed Forces in Hamburg (Helmut Schmidt University). He is a member of the Advisory Council on International Law at the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs and has extensively taught and published on matters concerning the use of force and international humanitarian law. His widely used textbook Völkerrecht ('International Law') is now in its fifth edition. In 2025, Andreas von Arnauld was appointed Max Planck Law Fellow by the President of the Max Planck Society for the project 'Fairness and International Law'.

Dr Kenneth Chan

Dr Kenneth Chan

Dr Kenneth Chan is Research Associate at the Walther Schücking Institute for International Law in Kiel. He was the Managing Editor of the German Yearbook of International Law and also taught the course 'International Criminal Law' at the Faculty of Law at the University of Kiel.

Tuesday, 14 July 2026
  • 1:30pm - 3:30pm: Justice for Ukraine? Options and Challenges of International Criminal Justice (Dr Paul Behrens)
  • 3:30pm - 4:00pm: Break
  • 4:00pm - 6:00pm: The View from Bucha: Was Genocide Committed in Ukraine? (Dr Paul Behrens) 
Wednesday, 15 July 2026
  • 1:30pm - 3:30pm: Attacks on Civilians and Mistreatment of Prisoners of War: War Crimes in Ukraine (Dr Kenneth Chan)
  • 3:30pm - 4:00pm: Break
  • 4:00pm - 6:00pm: The Lure of Nuremberg 2.0: Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression (Professor Andreas von Arnauld)

Please note that this course will not be recorded.

 

Image Credits 

The International Criminal Court in The Hague. Image Credit: OSeveno

US Prosecutor Sidney Alderman at the Nuremberg Trial. Artist: Edward Vebell

Law, Power and Political Economy Seminar Series

Subscribe to