Introduction to Law and Medical Ethics
The interface between law, medicine and ethics is a subject of great
contemporary interest and relevance. New developments in medical
practice and research are constantly in the headlines, and the
advancements in knowledge that this represents create new challenges, on
an almost weekly basis, that lawyers, judges, medical professionals and
the public find themselves struggling to address.
The aim of this module is to explore the critical relationship between
the law, and the practice of medicine, in order to set the groundwork
for discussions in the more topic-specific modules. In doing so, it will
focus on the varied approaches to, and multi-layered interrelationships
between, ethics, medicine and law, including basic ethical principles
and key (legal) concepts relating to, among others, personhood,
autonomy, human rights, sanctity of life, and quality of life.
Aims & objectives
To survey international 'codes', and a range of legal and ethical
approaches to a list of core concepts in medical practice, including
'duty' and 'utility';
Explore the definitions and limits of concepts of autonomy and
personhood as central, guiding, and often determinative principles; and
Investigate the position of the unborn child and the terminally ill
patient as examples of situations where law, ethical systems, and human
rights questions arise in a practical setting.
Learning outcomes
By the end of this module, you will be able to:
Understand the kinds of ethical arguments used in relation to medical
practice;
Appreciate the nature of the relationship between autonomy and
appropriate care, and the difference between personal morality and
ethical principle in clinical practice; and
Consider the pros and cons of accepting concepts of autonomy, personhood
and rights, including the criteria that you think are, or should be
relevant.
Examples of the questions explored in this module
How can a grounding in ethics and law help resolve dilemmas in medical
decision making?
How should we choose between equally reasonable and ethical positions or
actions, when the making of a choice is unavoidable, and one party (or
more) will suffer some form of negative health or legal consequence?
How can health care professionals reconcile their duty of care with
patients' refusals of treatment? Where are the limits of professional
duty?
Take-away Toolkit
"Top 10" ethical and legal principles determining good medical
decision-making, as incorporated in leading professional, legal and
international guidelines.



